Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Letter To A Friend Irate Over Message Machine Decorum


Dear Mike,

Forgive me for having taken so long to respond to your woeful request for an answering machine rant. Forgive me even further, because I can’t comply with your request. Actually I can, but I’m not going to, because I’ve got bigger fish to fry.
  
You really seem worked up over this whole recorded message thing. I do remember that awkward break-in period for users back in the mid Seventies maybe, where newbies to the late-breaking technology followed to the letter the stern instructions of the manufacturers, who warned that our messages must not divulge that the reason we weren’t answering our phones was because we weren’t home, and so the caller was free to break in and steal our Magnavox with the newly-installed Pong game. No, the words to be employed were, “Hi, we can’t come to the phone right now…”
  
The lame implication was that we might conceivably be sitting on the crapper with a loaded assault rifle resting across our knees, waiting for someone to misinterpret the message. I imagined teams of unlucky tele-burglars making random calls, in the hopes of hearing that message before hopping into their panel vans. Then off they’d scramble to the listed address, to be mowed down by a Rambo with a case of the runs.
   
Those days are long gone, unless you have one pathetic group on your “family and friends” list. Or, sadder still, those family and friends are in yet another awkward phase of their lives, having succumbed to the enticements of childrearing. They’re now proud parents of a kid that can almost speak English and is so darn cute trying that it would be a shame not to put his squeaky voice on their machine taking an ice age to burble out the fractured message you so hate hearing. Doesn’t it just make you want to coo like a damn pigeon? My brother says he knows of one such family, and he hates calling them for fear they may not be home.
  
If you still do have phone acquaintances who insist on being cutesy with their messages, disown them. Nobody does that anymore. We all learned that lesson the second time we heard the one where the message-maker pretends he’s there, and then reveals himself to be a recording. Har-dee-har. And here’s the recording of a five-minute dial tone, asshole.
  
What you’re being spared is the real abomination, which is that you can never actually get a human on the phone when calling a business anymore. What you get is a computer voice programmed to sound like it wants to help you out, but is in fact designed to sap you of resolve with an infinite list of useless options…

“Press 1 if you are completely happy with our service. Press 2 if you’d like to take a survey about how completely happy you are with our service. Press 3 if you want to add services that will triple your monthly bill. Press 4 if you’ve forgotten why you called in the first place…”

So you figure, what the hell, let’s just hit any number and get the ball rolling. But that solves nothing, because it sends you into yet another hierarchical list of questions taking you further from the source of your problem. So then you start yelling into your phone, and because voice recognition technology has come so far, the conversation starts to sound like a couple in a failing relationship (not far from the truth, in fact), where the one who wants to stay in the relationship is acting infuriatingly reasonable. Let’s begin with the reasonable one:

“Let me see if I can help you today. Try to tell me what your problem is.”

“I’ve got no internet service.”

“I’m sorry. I didn’t get that. Please try to tell me what it is you’re calling about.”

“My internet doesn’t work.”

“I’m sorry. I still don’t understand. Would you like to speak to someone in billing?”

“No.”

“Okay. How might I help you?”

“Talk to a human being.”

I’m sorry. I didn’t get that.”

“Internet broken you bastards are crooks I want to TERMINATE SERVICE!”

“Let me see if I understand. You’re calling about a problem with your internet service. Is that right?”

“Damn right.”

“I’m sorry. I didn’t get that. What seems to be your problem today.”

“I hate you!”

“Okay, let me connect you with someone who might be able to help…”

(long pause)

“Welcome to customer support. We are experiencing unusual wait times due to high call volume. The average wait time is twenty minutes. Did you know you can have most of your questions answered online at our website?”


And you think you have problems, Michael? For the record, here is what our machine says: “Hi, this is Paul. Deb and I aren’t in right now so leave a message and we’ll get back to you as soon as we can.”

I say this quickly, and I enunciate clearly. It’s over like that. I think it’s nice to leave our names, because that way people know they’ve called the right number. Strangely enough, I still get messages from people asking for Tony, or Dr. Papsmere, so go figure.

My message is quick and polite, which is my way of saying, “I might be monitoring this call because I’m not driving in dense fog right now (you’ll get the reference later), but I might not be home, so break in if you feel lucky, douchebag. In any event, please do start by talking to the answering machine.”

My older sister uses the programmed robot voice option, because she’s, well she's a little kooky, and clearly has paranoid leanings. Come on, say hi! What are you, in the witness protection program? Oh never mind. I have another sister. I’ll call her instead.

One thing I don’t understand is the message, “If you’d like to leave a call-back number, press 5 now.” What the hell is that about? Does that absolve me of the responsibility of having to talk? Isn’t that what I was planning to do when I dialed your number in the first place? Should I leave my number shrouded in mystery? I might be a pal wanting to shoot the breeze, or I may be the IRS. You decide.

One of these days I’ll have to hit 5, just to see what happens. I have to say, when I get a call on my cell phone and don’t get to it in time, and I don’t recognize the caller (which is to say the phone doesn’t), I’m highly disinclined to call back if the caller doesn’t bother to leave a message. I guess it just wasn’t important enough to say why he wanted to waste my time. So I won’t waste mine either.

While I’m on the topic of talking on the phone, here is my observation of what I consider one of the strangest of human behaviors, and I’ve noticed it more than once. Say I’m a passenger in a car, and the driver’s cell phone goes off. It then seems as if no amount of clear and present danger will stop the driver from answering the phone that very second. Said driver could be driving at high speed in crowded traffic at night in dense fog (get it now?), and they’ll go digging through whatever pocket is emitting the sound of that ridiculous ringtone (ringtones are a whole other topic).

Yet once that driver is happily ensconced at home with nothing better to do, and the landline (that’s what you call your home phone now, if you have one) rings, he or she will sit there for the interminable four rings (the default setting for answering machines before they pick up), then the message (which as we know, you despise) and then find out who’s calling, at which point it’s a race to pick up before the caller hangs up. It’s just weird, man.

So there you go. I can’t say as I’ve satisfied you, but I’ve satisfied myself, and that’s the important thing. Next time we go after messaging.